Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-mi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199386 panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2006-07-19 04:24 EST ------- I just downloaded aspell-es package and rebuild it and when i ran rpmlint i got W: aspell-es summary-ended-with-dot Spanish dictionaries for Aspell. E: aspell-es no-binary E: aspell-es only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: aspell-es no-documentation and rpmlint on your package gave E: aspell-mi no-binary E: aspell-mi only-non-binary-in-usr-lib so i think those errors are not that much important as aspell core packages are having same errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review