Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199016 michael@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |michael@xxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From michael@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-19 03:15 EST ------- Hi. I will do the review for this. Review for release 3: * RPM name is OK * Source mxml-2.2.2.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of mxml-devel looks OK * rpmlint of mxml looks OK * File list of mxml-devel looks OK * File list of mxml looks OK * INSERT RESULT OF RUN TEST Needs work: * Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros (wiki: QAChecklist item 7) Notes: You need to use %{_datadir} not /usr/share Fix this up and I can approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review