Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198881 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-18 12:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Ralf, honestly, please stop hammering on the packagers and get the Perl specfile > template changed instead. I'm with Ralf on this, as usual. The template is a starting point, and that's all. It needs customising for each package, which involves adding package-specific stuff and removing bits that aren't needed. It really isn't an onerous task to remove the bits that aren't needed and it sets a good example for other packagers, who often look at existing packages in the repository to find out out what "best practice" is. > Maybe make fedora-newrpmspec call into cpanspec > instead, which will not generate the bits you object to for noarch packages. That would be nice, but fedora-newrpmspec does not appear to have an interface for specifying whether a package is noarch or not. > I'm not going to block on anything that's just following the template that we > put in place for them to follow. It's a template, not a release-ready spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review