Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting@xxxxxxxxxx |jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|188271 |188272 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-17 09:16 EST ------- Package looks very clean, just a comment: You obsolete lclint, but don't provide lclint. Does this package not offer the functionality of lclint? When was the last time lclint was shipped? Do we even need to worry about obsoleting something we haven't shipped in a supported upgrade release? (IE RHEL4) RPMLINT output: E: splint-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/splint-3.1.1/src/llerror.c E: splint obsolete-not-provided lclint W: splint devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/splint/lib/bool.h W: splint devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/splint/lib/linux.h W: splint devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/splint/lib/posix.h W: splint devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/splint/lib/standard.h W: splint devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/splint/lib/stdio.h W: splint devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/splint/lib/stdlib.h W: splint devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/splint/lib/unix.h W: splint incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.1.1-15 3.1.1-15.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review