[Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836





------- Additional Comments From besfahbo@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-07-16 00:53 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> > %package utils
> > Summary: A collection of FreeType 1.x utilities
> > Group: System Environment/Libraries
> > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
> > # Upgrade path
> > Provides: freetype-utils = 2.2.0-1
> > Obsoletes: freetype-utils < 2.2.0-1
> 
> Very ugly. At the time this freetype-utils sub-package was
> introduced, it should have started at 1.x, not 2.x.
> 
> You could still do that with a proper Epoch.

Right.  So, should I use Epoch instead?  Like:

Provides: freetype-utils = 1:1.4-0.1.pre


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]