Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-16 00:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > %package utils > > Summary: A collection of FreeType 1.x utilities > > Group: System Environment/Libraries > > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > > # Upgrade path > > Provides: freetype-utils = 2.2.0-1 > > Obsoletes: freetype-utils < 2.2.0-1 > > Very ugly. At the time this freetype-utils sub-package was > introduced, it should have started at 1.x, not 2.x. > > You could still do that with a proper Epoch. Right. So, should I use Epoch instead? Like: Provides: freetype-utils = 1:1.4-0.1.pre -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review