Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-14 18:11 EST ------- IMHO neither GnuTLS nor NSS are providing the same like OpenSSL, otherwise we wouldn't ship OpenSSL within Core, right? What is the (possible) legal problem you are seeing? At least from my personal understanding any binary linking to OpenSSL could be illegal when the local law conflicts with encryption. For me this sounds similar like at the mp3 stuff... I'm building per default using OpenSSL, because every Fedora Core user has this package installed and it is used by many applications (rpm -e --test openssl). If possible, I want to cause less new dependencies and I also don't want to force FE users to install another package/library when the already available one does the same. Blocking FE-Legal now, waiting for official response because of the "probably illegal", even when I can't see any real reason. Somebody of the legal people has to remove this blocking when it's resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review