Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL Alias: sage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198834 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx 2006-07-14 04:07 EST ------- - rpmlint output clean - package name meets package naming guidelines - spec file name matches package %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license O license does not match upstream license - license included in %doc - spec file in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream 4eea72b30a88dbe5d512009913462fc3 sage-0.1.2.tar.gz - package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC-5 - all dependencies are listed in BuildRequires - package properly containst %post/%postun ldconfig - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - package does not contain duplicate files - file permissions set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains permissible content - package does not contain large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - header files are in devel - pkgconfig files are in devel - libraries w/o suffix are in devel - devel package requires base package - package does not contain any .la files - package is not a GUI needing .desktop files - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST ==== - devel package should Requires: pkgconfig - use %{_mandir} instead of %{_datadir}/man - notify upstream about --disable-static failure - fix license to match upstream license - had to download source from: http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/worldforge/sage-0.1.2.tar.gz Source0 should be updated accordingly ==== SHOULD ===== - add a %check even though it doesnt do anything now, it may in future -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review