[Bug 198691] Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198691


panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG
                 CC|                            |panemade@xxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx  2006-07-13 15:01 EST -------
== Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored ==
   Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull with warnings 
CvrStgObject.h:40: warning: 'class CvrStgObject' has virtual functions but
non-virtual destructor
MCryptPPTest.cc: In member function 'bool MCryptPPTest::genericTestDecryption()':
MCryptPPTest.cc:47: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
MCryptPPTest.cc: In member function 'bool MCryptPPTest::genericTestEncryption()':
MCryptPPTest.cc:43: warning: control reaches end of non-void function


* MUST Items:
      - rpmlint shows no error. 
      - dist tag is present.
      - The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
      - The spec file name matching the base package steghide, in the
format steghide.spec.
      - This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
      - The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
      - The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
      - This package includes License file COPYING.
      - This source package includes the text of the license in its own file,and
that file, containing the text of the license for the package is included in %doc.
      - The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (5be490e24807d921045780fd8cc446b3)
      - This package successfully compiled and built into binary rpms for i386
architecture.
      - This package did not containd any ExcludeArch.
      - This package handled locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Not used %{_datadir}/locale/*.
      - This package owns all directories that it creates. 
      - This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
      - This package  have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
      - This package used macros.
      - Document files are included like README.
      - Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives.

Also,
      * Source URL is present and working.
      * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:       
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
      * BuildRequires is correct
      * Package is working fine on i386.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]