[Bug 198131] Review Request: glibmm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glibmm


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198131





------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-07-10 03:16 EST -------
gtkmm24 != glibmm24 :)
However, glibmm24 was in there.  I guess my searching didn't notice the packages. :(

Although off-topic to this bug, I believe that the packages shouldn't have the
'24' suffix.  GNOME named the glibmm and gtkmm without the suffix, so why does
Red Hat add the suffix?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]