Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glibmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198131 ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-10 03:16 EST ------- gtkmm24 != glibmm24 :) However, glibmm24 was in there. I guess my searching didn't notice the packages. :( Although off-topic to this bug, I believe that the packages shouldn't have the '24' suffix. GNOME named the glibmm and gtkmm without the suffix, so why does Red Hat add the suffix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review