[Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pcb


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482


j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx      |j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx  2006-07-09 06:41 EST -------
Since no one has commented lets just handle things in this Review Request. Here
is a full Review for Chitlesh's version, not Peter's! :

MUST:
=====
* rpmlint output is:
E: pcb info-dir-file /usr/share/info/dir
This must be fixed, add "rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_infodir}/dir" in %install
* Package and spec file named appropriately
* Packaged according to packaging guidelines
* License (GPL) ok, license fileS included
* spec file is legible and in Am. English.
* Source matches upstream
* Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64
* BR: ok
* No locales
* No shared libraries
* Not relocatable
* Package owns / or requires all dirs (with some strangeness see Must fix
below)
* No duplicate files & Permissions ok
* %clean & macro usage OK
* Contains code.
* %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package
* no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files.
* .desktop file as required and properly installed


MUST fix:
=========
* rpmlint output is:
E: pcb info-dir-file /usr/share/info/dir
This must be fixed, add "rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_infodir}/dir" in %install.
Without this fixed installing it gives:
Preparing...                ########################################### [100%]
        file /usr/share/info/dir from install of pcb-0.20060422-1 conflicts with
file from package info-4.8-11
You probaly didn't see this on your system because the dir file getting
generated depends on the system configuration on which the package is build,
hence the -f to rm, so that if the dir file isn't there it doesn't cause an error.
* You are missing the following requires for the texinfo script:
Requires(post): /sbin/install-info
Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info


Should fix:
===========
* Add an icon and install it under:
  %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps
  Where 32x32 is the size of the icon, please do ls /usr/share/icons/hicolor/
  to see the available valid sizes, if the icon doesn't match any pick the 
  closest.
* Once the icon is in the proper plase you must add %post(un) script to update 
  the icon-cache see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-fc74f078205565f961f6d836b77c3428619c689d


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]