[Bug 198023] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198023





------- Additional Comments From cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-07-08 20:19 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> package is noarch
> 
> =>   OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}"
> is unused/superfluous.
> 
> =>  This find also is very likely unnecessary:
> find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';'
> 
> Chris, Jason, this is a systematic bug in most (all) of Chris's perl packages.

How is this a "bug"?  It's part of the standard perl specfile template, doesn't
conflict with any of the packaging guidelines, and it certainly isn't doing any
harm.  Is it worth 5-10 min of my time to to make sure that these lines are
indeed not needed, and then another 5-10min for the reviewer to also 1) notice
the deviation from the template, and 2) ensure that the packager's determination
that the lines are superfluous and can be dropped is correct?

If this is a "bug", then let's get it before the packaging committee and have
the guidelines for perl packages changed to explicitly require excising those
lines.  Otherwise, let's call it "packager's preference/style"; and as they say
in perl-land, TMTOWTDI :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]