Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192577 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-08 15:06 EST ------- Well, the versioned dependency is completely meaningless in that case, so there's little point in having both. The dependency list is now: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(CGI) perl(CGI::Cookie) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(File::Type) perl(FileHandle) perl(HTTP::Headers) perl(HTTP::Response) perl(HTTP::Status) perl(IO::Null) perl(OpenFrame) perl(OpenFrame::Argument::Blob) perl(OpenFrame::Cookie) perl(OpenFrame::Cookies) perl(OpenFrame::Object) perl(OpenFrame::Request) perl(OpenFrame::Response) perl(OpenFrame::Segment::HTTP::Response) perl(Pipeline) perl(Pipeline::Production) perl(Pipeline::Segment) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) Looks good; APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review