Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2006-07-06 11:32 EST ------- Using GPL instead of GNU GPL is a matter of convention. If there is a mix of GPL and public domain code, the resulting subpackage is covered by the GPL. However if you want to make clear which part of the subpackage are under which licence, you can add a file explaining more precisely the licences of the different parts of that subpackage, and put it in %docs. If you can isolate the parts that are public domain in a subpackage, then the licence may be public domain for that subpackage. Licence issues are not technical issues, but they are as important as technical issues. As a side note, you can omit the Licence: tag from subpackages when it is the same than the licence of the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review