Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-06 02:25 EST ------- Just some comments: * The spec file and http://www.aurore.net/projects/libical say: "This is a modified version of the original libical project." i.e. this package would conflict with the "original libical" I am not sufficiently familiar with libical, but this raises concerns on your package: - Is this libical*aurore API compatible to the "original libical"? What are the differences? - Is the "original libical" still alive? - How is this package supposed to interact with an "original libical"? * The package installs its headers to /usr/include. Though the headers all are prefixed "ical*", this pollutes the system header include path. Besides this, the package seems to be clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review