[Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732





------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx  2006-07-06 01:16 EST -------
Ok i search your website and found that SRPM.

== Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored ==
* Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull
 
MUST Items:
     - MUST: rpmlint shows error as
      rpmlint -i optipng-0.5.2-1.src.rpm
      W: optipng invalid-license zlib/libpng
      The license you specified is invalid. The valid licenses are:

      -GPL                                    -LGPL
      -Artistic                               -BSD
      -MIT                                    -QPL
      -MPL                                    -IBM Public License
      -Apache License                         -PHP License
      -Public Domain                          -Modified CNRI Open Source License 
      -zlib License                           -CVW License
      -Ricoh Source Code Public License       -Python license
      -Vovida Software License                -Sun Internet Standards Source License
      -Intel Open Source License              -Jabber Open Source License

      if the license is close to an existing one, you can use '<license> style'.

==>You Need provide package with Open Source Licenses Mentioned above. Though
you have provided zlib/libpng and zlib is present, you can ignore this warning.

     - MUST: dist tag is present
     - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
     - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package optipng, in the
format optipng.spec
      - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
      - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license
zlib/libpng.
      - MUST: License file License.txt is included in package.
      - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (8cc507e596c95ee44621f7adc8ce0534).
      - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. 
      - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
      - MUST: This package  have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
      - MUST: This package used macros.
      - MUST: Document files are included like README.txt.
      - MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives.
      * Source URL is present and working.
      * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:       
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
      * BuildRequires is correct
   


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]