[Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ibmasm


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059


opensource@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |opensource@xxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From opensource@xxxxxxxxx  2006-07-05 18:06 EST -------
- The Release-tag misses %{?dist}, e.g. Release: 6%{?dist}
- The spec file does not use %{optflags}, so nothing is compiled with the 
typical flags of Fedora that include some security relevant flags.
You can change this, e.g. with export CFLAGS="%{optflags}" prior to the first 
make and patch the Makefiles to make the compiler use CFLAGS
- You need to run ldconfig since you install an .so file in /lib.
- The License should be installed in the docdir and included in the upstream 
source package if it is not.

Btw. you just need to wait until an official reviewer reviews your package and 
a Sponsor sponsers you. They will also tell you what else you need to change, 
if there is anything.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]