Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flasm - Flash bytecode assembler disassembler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197487 Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-03 14:39 EST ------- Good: + Tarballs is the same as the upstream. + Local build ok. + Mock build works fine to FC-5. + rpmlint doesn't complaints the source rpm. + rpmlint doesn't complaints the binary rpm. + license seem to be OSS compilant. + rpm contains verbatin copy of the license. + filelist in binary rpm ok. + program can start without crash. ACCEPTED !!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review