Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-30 07:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #7) > > => The *.so inside of the plugin dir seem to be needed. > > And those are the .so files rpmlint is complaining about. I don't know why rpmlint complains. All I can say is, the package's plugin stuff dlopens the *.so's, i.e. the package is not correctly building the plugins. > > Finally, ... given what I see, I am not sure, I want to see this package in > > Fedora :( > > Its GPL'ed, its a functional Well, the code lets me have doubts on this ... > and useful application. I see no reason why it > should not be consider a worthy application. I won't hinder you from continuing your submission, ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review