Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From michael@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-30 06:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > I wasn't sure if the *.so files should be split into a devel package or not. > Well, this package applies a rather weird SONAME'ing scheme. > > => The %{_libdir}/lib*-<version>.so's should be part of the main package. > => The %{_libdir}/lib*.so (without version inside) should be made part of a > devel package or not be installed at all. Without the package providing an API > (headers) to the libraries, installing the lib*.so's would be pointless. > > => The *.so inside of the plugin dir seem to be needed. And those are the .so files rpmlint is complaining about. > Finally, ... given what I see, I am not sure, I want to see this package in > Fedora :( Its GPL'ed, its a functional and useful application. I see no reason why it should not be consider a worthy application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review