[Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ntop


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198





------- Additional Comments From michael@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-06-30 06:09 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> > I wasn't sure if the *.so files should be split into a devel package or not. 
> Well, this package applies a rather weird SONAME'ing scheme.
> 
> => The %{_libdir}/lib*-<version>.so's should be part of the main package.
> => The %{_libdir}/lib*.so (without version inside) should be made part of a
> devel package or not be installed at all. Without the package providing an API
> (headers) to the libraries, installing the lib*.so's would be pointless.
> 
> => The *.so inside of the plugin dir seem to be needed.

And those are the .so files rpmlint is complaining about.
 
> Finally, ... given what I see, I am not sure, I want to see this package in
> Fedora :(

Its GPL'ed, its a functional and useful application. I see no reason why it
should not be consider a worthy application. 


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]