[Bug 196622] Review Request: perl-PerlIO-eol - PerlIO layer for normalizing line endings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-PerlIO-eol - PerlIO layer for normalizing line endings


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196622


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-06-28 20:58 EST -------
Note that BuildRequires: perl is redundant; it is in the default build root. 
The version requirement is satisfied on all platforms that Extras supports so
it's safe to leave it out.

Review:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream. 
* source files match upstream:
   7e11fb1cc3b2a65678714877ae361823  PerlIO-eol-0.13.tar.gz
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   eol.so()(64bit)
   perl(PerlIO::eol) = 0.13
   perl-PerlIO-eol = 0.13-3.fc6
  =
   perl >= 0:5.007003
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(Exporter)
   perl(XSLoader)
* shared libraries are present, internal to Perl.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=1, Tests=23,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr +  0.01 csys =  0.03 CPU)
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]