Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR Alias: php-pear-PCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx 2006-06-28 19:12 EST ------- I read your post on fedora-packaging, did you check the fedora-packaging archives? Your question comes up about once a month. Here is a similar thread that comes to the conclusion I suggested: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-March/msg00004.html "Best Practice" is to keep the License tag as simple as possible and to place the license text in %doc as I suggested. Note also that this is a SHOULD and not a MUST. If you feel you do not want to follow "best practices" then feel free not to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review