Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196865 j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-06-27 14:15 EST ------- Some quick initial remarks: Why are these lines there but commented, for FC-5 ? : # This is probably temporary until the above libs get their dependencies # right # BuildRequires: libSM-devel libICE-devel libX11-devel libXrandr-devel # BuildRequires: libXau-devel libXi-devel libXft-devel libXinerama-devel # BuildRequires: libXcursor-devel libXrender-devel libXext-devel libXfixes-devel # BuildRequires: libXdmcp-devel libXt-devel Why doesn't this obsolete and provides the current version of bmp. This is a newer bugfixed/enhanced version of bmp right? Is there anything bmp can do that this can't? I thought this was intended as a bmp (and ultimatly xmms) replacement. Or are you planning on maintaining audacious next to bmp? In that case do we really want 3 xmms versions (the original + 2 forks) in FE? I'll try todo a full review tomorrow. For today I've spend enough time behind my PC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review