Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 ------- Additional Comments From jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-26 17:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > The %check section is skipped on non-i386 architectures because one of the tests > > fail. > > Perhaps that indicates that this package doesn't actually work on x86_64. Have > you consulted upstream? The failed test is testing iksemel's own SHA1 has implementation, which obviously has some 64-bit unclean code. As long as you avoid using the internal SHA1 code you're good to go. (I actually use iksemel on a x86_64 box.) > > I also decided to stick with re-running autotools because BR'ing libtool > > would pull in autoconf and automake anyway, although setting > > LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool worked to remove the rpath. > > It's not about pulling them in; it's about running them in the first place. You > really shouldn't re-autotool a package unless you simply have no other choice. > In this case there is a perfectly good and well-accepted alternative. Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/iksemel-1.2-4.fc5.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/iksemel-1.2-4.fc5.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jun 26 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> - 1.2-4 - Don't re-run autotools, fix rpath in a different way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review