Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wcstools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184450 dan@xxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dan@xxxxxxxx 2006-06-26 13:10 EST ------- Review: - no defective rpmlint output - package name OK - spec file name OK, is in English and is legible - package meets the Packaging Guidelines - licenses OK (GPL/LGPL) and are included - source matches upstream - compiles and builds at least on i386 - no BuildRequires needed - no localized files - has a shared lib and uses ldconfig as scriptlet shell - creates and owns a directory and does not conflict with existing dirs - no duplicates files, permissions are set properly, uses %defattr - has %clean section - consistent use of macros - contains code - no large docs, %doc is not required during runtime - has devel subpackage, no pkgconfig file - no .la libtool archives - not a GUI application APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review