[Bug 184450] Review Request: wcstools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wcstools


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184450


dan@xxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From dan@xxxxxxxx  2006-06-26 13:10 EST -------
Review:
- no defective rpmlint output
- package name OK
- spec file name OK, is in English and is legible
- package meets the Packaging Guidelines
- licenses OK (GPL/LGPL) and are included
- source matches upstream
- compiles and builds at least on i386
- no BuildRequires needed
- no localized files
- has a shared lib and uses ldconfig as scriptlet shell
- creates and owns a directory and does not conflict with existing dirs
- no duplicates files, permissions are set properly, uses %defattr
- has %clean section
- consistent use of macros
- contains code
- no large docs, %doc is not required during runtime
- has devel subpackage, no pkgconfig file
- no .la libtool archives
- not a GUI application

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]