Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-26 07:07 EST ------- The gcc warnings because of dereferencing type-punned pointer have to be handled by upstream and IIRC they are even OpenSSL not BitlBee related. Most Extras and Core packages are having such warnings, because the world is using older gccs. To your first point at the todo list: No, no - never, sorry. You didn't look into the tarball neither you called ./configure --help by hand. Finally a `grep -ri libdir bitlbee-1.0.3` returns nothing. For me there is no reason only to make rpmlint happy by applying unneccessary and even unused parameters. To your second point at the todo list: I can't aggree with you when reading the Fedora (Extras) Packaging Guidelines. There is neither "a lot of documentation" nor is runtime (when installing/updating/erasing) affected by handling exactly 16 files consuming maximal 150 KB of space. Waiting for another opinion before changing anything. XML documentation could be skipped as there is very less similar in /usr/share/doc/*/ of my system. Doing this would reduce %{_docdir} to 100 KB which would just host AUTHORS, CHANGES, COPYING, CREDITS, FAQ, README and user-guide.txt. On the other hand, I can't absolutely see why such basic files (except the 35 KB of user-guide.txt) should be moved into a -doc subpackage... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review