[Bug 196601] Review Request: vobject - A python library for manipulating vCard and vCalendar files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: vobject -  A python library for manipulating vCard and vCalendar files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196601


panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |panemade@xxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx  2006-06-25 23:18 EST -------
Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored
Mock build for development i386 is suceesfull with some warnings
+ /usr/bin/python setup.py build
/usr/lib/python2.4/distutils/dist.py:236: UserWarning: Unknown distribution
option: 'zip_safe'
  warnings.warn(msg)
/usr/lib/python2.4/distutils/dist.py:236: UserWarning: Unknown distribution
option: 'install_requires'
  warnings.warn(msg)

MUST Items:
     - MUST: rpmlint shows no error on i386
     - MUST: dist tag is present
     - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
     - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package vobject, in the
format vobject.spec
      - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
      - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license
Apache Software License.
      - MUST: The License field in the package vobject.spec file did not match
any file in tarball.
      - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct.
      - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. 
      - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
      - MUST: This package  have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
      - MUST: This package used macros.
      - MUST: Document files are included like README.txt

      * Source URL is present and working.
      * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:       
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
      * BuildRequires is correct

What you Need:-
      * You dont need to have 
Requires:       python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]")
       as this is only for rpms targetting for FC3 or prior.
       * Add License file in tarball if you can alter the tarball contents.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]