Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libhugetlbfs - easy access to huge pages of memory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196057 nacc@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED CC| |nacc@xxxxxxxxxx Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From nacc@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-23 13:24 EST ------- RE: hugetlbd always being 32-bit. Yes, that is intentional. The original reason was to avoid having to always ask bug submitters which version of the daemon were you running. But, given that a 64-bit user could install both the 64-bit and 32-bit libhugetlbfs packages, this also happens to avoid deciding which hugetlbd should exist, right (as both obj32/hugetlbd and obj64/hugetlbd would be installed into the same location)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review