Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Calendar-Simple - Perl extension to create simple calendars https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196403 ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2006-06-23 01:45 EST ------- Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored Mock build for i386 development is successfull. MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint shows no error - MUST: dist tag is present - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package perl-Calender-Simple, in the format perl-Calender-Simple.spec - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - MUST: The License field in the package perl-Calender-Simple.spec file matches the actual license file COPYING in tarball. - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct. - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - MUST: This package used macros. - MUST: Document files are included like README. * Source URL is Not present. I need to remove DA from URL. Working Source URL for me http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DAVECROSS/Calendar-Simple-1.13.tar.gz * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * BuildRequires is correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review