[Bug 196176] Review Request: crystal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: crystal


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196176


panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |panemade@xxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx  2006-06-22 01:11 EST -------
Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored
Mock Built for i386 development is successfull with
cpio: crystal-1.0.0/client/<built-in>: No such file or directory
cpio: crystal-1.0.0/client/config/<built-in>: No such file or directory

MUST Items:
     - MUST: rpmlint shows no error 
     - MUST: dist tag is present
     - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
     - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package crystal, in the
format crystal.spec
      - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
      - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
      - MUST: The License field in the package crystal.spec file matches the
actual license file COPYING in tarball.
      - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct.
      - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. 
      - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
      - MUST: This package  have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
      - MUST: This package used macros.
      - MUST: Document files are included like INSTALL README.
      - MUST: Package is calling ldconfig on postun post successfully.
      * Source URL is present.
      * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:       
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
      * BuildRequires is correct
    
      Not tested Desktop Icon but found its installed successfully.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]