Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-21 13:33 EST ------- OK, this builds in mock on x86_64, development. First thing I see is an empty debuginfo package, because this is an arch-dependent package that doesn't seem to have any binaries. Can this truly not be noarch? There's also this: E: eric no-binary The a whole pile of E: eric non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/eric3/eric3.py 0644 which are caused by these modules erroneously all starting with a shebang line. In the past folks have just removed such lines. Then there are a few of these: W: eric non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gen_sip_api.pyo 0644 W: eric non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gen_sip_api.pyc 0644 W: eric non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gen_python_api.pyo 0644 W: eric non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gen_python_api.pyc 0644 RPM will compile and optimize every single .py file it finds, even in bindir, which is obviously a bug but it seems isn't going to be fixed. I suggest either deleting these files or %exclude'ing them, preferably the former in case rpm gets fixed to stop generating these in the future. Also, this rpm behavior means that you will get .pyo files everywhere even if you don't ask for it, so you'll need to %ghost them all. Unfortunately this considerably complicates the %files list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review