[Bug 196101] Review Request: mimedefang

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mimedefang


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196101


paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-06-21 07:13 EST -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> Unfortunately rpmlint isn't quiet on x86_32:
> E: mimedefang non-standard-uid /var/log/mimedefang defang
> E: mimedefang non-standard-gid /var/log/mimedefang defang
> E: mimedefang non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/mimedefang 0750
> E: mimedefang non-standard-uid /var/spool/MD-Quarantine defang
> E: mimedefang non-standard-gid /var/spool/MD-Quarantine defang
> E: mimedefang non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/MD-Quarantine 0750
> E: mimedefang non-standard-uid /var/spool/MIMEDefang defang
> E: mimedefang non-standard-gid /var/spool/MIMEDefang defang
> E: mimedefang non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/MIMEDefang 0750
> W: mimedefang service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/mimedefang
> W: mimedefang incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/mimedefang $prog
> 
> IMHO all lines marked with error can't be really avoided, the first warning
line should be correct...when installing MIMEDefang, it should be enabled, too.
Last warning line seems to be caused by some rpmlint confusion ;-)

I would agree with you on all of these apart from the service-default-enabled
one. The system admin should be the one to enable a service if they want it, and
sendmail needs to be reconfigured manually to talk to it anyway.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]