Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From mkanat@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-20 18:42 EST ------- Bugzilla tarballs never themselves include localconfig. Also, the RPM should never include it. Thus, it should never be overwritten in an upgrade. The best way to move it is just to edit the $localconfig variable in Bugzilla::Config. Don't change $libdir--that doesn't work. As far as the dependencies, it should be pretty easy, as you said, to get checksetup or some variant of it to print out the requirements in the format you need. If you search for "my $modules" and any calls to "have_vers" in checksetup.pl you can see where it stores the requirements. In the CVS version of Bugzilla this will be even easier since the requirements will mostly be in a separate .pm file, and you can write a script that just uses that module to print out the info. I think all the minimums included with FC4 are probably fine. I think we don't require anything too recent, for 2.22. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review