Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdk-pixbuf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194353 kevin@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2006-06-19 15:47 EST ------- Sure, I can take a look at imlib later today. Re static libs, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 If some app static links to this package and there is a security update it will be vulnerable until it's rebuilt against the updated package. I would say to exclude them unless you know of a specific need for them. If there is a specific need, you might add a note on it to the spec file. For rpmlint now we have: can be ignored: W: gdk-pixbuf-devel no-documentation W: gdk-pixbuf-gnome no-documentation might remove the trailing . on the -gnome subpackage summary? W: gdk-pixbuf-gnome summary-ended-with-dot GnomeCanvas support for displaying images. might remove the Patch4 and Patch9 now that they are not used? W: gdk-pixbuf patch-not-applied Patch4: gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0-libtool15.patch W: gdk-pixbuf patch-not-applied Patch9: gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0-nognome.patch All those are minor issues and not blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug as NEXTRELEASE once the package is imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review