[Bug 195867] Review Request: tetex-IEEEtran Official LaTeX class for IEEE transactions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tetex-IEEEtran Official LaTeX class for IEEE transactions


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195867


panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |panemade@xxxxxxxxx
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx  2006-06-19 00:54 EST -------
Review for this package:-
    Mock Build Results for i386 
       -Successfully built on i386
MUST Items:
     - MUST: rpmlint shows error 
        W: tetex-IEEEtran invalid-license Perl Artistic License
     - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
     - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package IEEEtran.zip, is not
in the format IEEEtran.spec
      You CAN change upstream package name to tetex-IEEEtran.spec
      - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
      - MUST: The package is NOT licensed with any open-source compatible license.
      - MUST: The License field in the package tetex-IEEEtran.spec file is NOT
included in upstream tarball.
      - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct.
      - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. 
      - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
      - MUST: This package  have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
      - MUST: This package used macros.
      - MUST: Document files are included like README.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]