Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork: Additional artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194279 imlinux@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |imlinux@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From imlinux@xxxxxxxxx 2006-06-18 00:08 EST ------- - Name looks good - Source matches upstream - Builds fine in mock against devel - rpmlint: SRPM: E: kdeartwork unknown-key GPG#ff6382fa kdeartwork: CLEAN kdeartwork-icons: W: kdeartwork-icons no-documentation E: kdeartwork-icons standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/icons One thing. right now this package owns /usr/share/icons/ Aparently it's not alone. rpm -qf /usr/share/icons My box shows 6 packages owning that directory. The guidelines state that your package must own all directories it creates and must not own any directories that another package creates. My suggestion is to go ahead and take out ownership of that directory and file a bugzilla for the filesystem package. If they refuse with a valid reason then I say go ahead and own it. I'll wait for your response (and others) before I approve the package but aside from the ownership issue this package is ready to go, that is of course depending on what you decide to do for #195480 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review