Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 ------- Additional Comments From thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-17 06:27 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing, much appreciated ! - changed license, but it still complains. Filed http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/22 - re: changelog version; my name + email is rather long, and frequently extends the width to more than 80 chars if I add version. I filed http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/23 and http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/24 (with patch) If this is not critical I would like to keep this as-is for aesthetic reasons. - got rid of rpath, ugh @ hacks. This will teach me to actually lint on a 64 bit machine - apparently this doesn't cause trouble on a 32 bit one. - %makeinstall: that wiki entry is factually wrong and lacking any actual reasons except dogma - I will ask spot about it. In the case of this package, there is nothing wrong when doing makeinstall. Unless you insist I prefer to keep it. - smp_mflags added - OPTIMIZE removed - make instead of %{__make} done - make check added. pinging upstream about test failures - since upstream did not set it up to actually error out on those errors, and there are few, I'm assuming for now these are expected or non-critical failures. New version: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-i386-extras/rasqal-0.9.12-2.fc5/ Thanks again ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review