Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195015 michael@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |michael@xxxxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-17 04:24 EST ------- * RPM name is OK * Source xpa-2.1.6.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of xpa-devel looks OK * rpmlint of xpa looks OK * File list of xpa-devel looks OK * File list of xpa looks OK I would recommend you just add some white space between the %package devel and %description devel. Same again for %install and %clean, just improves the flow and readability of your spec file. If you make those changes, I see no reason why I can't approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review