[Bug 193846] Review Request: ganglia - Ganglia Distributed Monitoring System

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ganglia - Ganglia Distributed Monitoring System


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193846


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-06-15 12:21 EST -------
The latest rpmlint output:

W: ganglia-devel no-dependency-on ganglia
W: ganglia-devel no-documentation
E: ganglia-gmetad non-standard-uid /var/lib/ganglia/rrds ganglia
E: ganglia-gmetad non-standard-gid /var/lib/ganglia/rrds ganglia
W: ganglia-gmetad incoherent-init-script-name gmetad
W: ganglia-gmond incoherent-init-script-name gmond

All of which are OK.

Is the license really BSD?  It doesn't seem to have the no-endorsement clause. 
I'd just call it MIT but I'll leave it up to you.

Review:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
? license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
* source files match upstream:
   c48320a112db20e8372ae8e89d97583e  ganglia-3.0.3.tar.gz
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (x86_64, development).
* rpmlint has only ignorable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:

  ganglia-devel-3.0.3-7.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   libganglia-3.0.3.so.0()(64bit)
   ganglia-devel = 3.0.3-7.fc6
  =
   /bin/sh
   /sbin/ldconfig
   libganglia-3.0.3.so.0()(64bit)

  ganglia-gmetad-3.0.3-7.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   config(ganglia-gmetad) = 3.0.3-7.fc6
   ganglia-gmetad = 3.0.3-7.fc6
  =
   /bin/sh
   config(ganglia-gmetad) = 3.0.3-7.fc6
   librrd.so.2()(64bit)

  ganglia-gmond-3.0.3-7.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   config(ganglia-gmond) = 3.0.3-7.fc6
   ganglia-gmond = 3.0.3-7.fc6
  =
   /bin/sh
   config(ganglia-gmond) = 3.0.3-7.fc6

  ganglia-web-3.0.3-7.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   config(ganglia-web) = 3.0.3-7.fc6
   ganglia-web = 3.0.3-7.fc6
  =
   config(ganglia-web) = 3.0.3-7.fc6
   ganglia-gmetad >= 3.0.3
   rrdtool

* shared libraries are present; ldconfig is called properly.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* scriptlets present (ldconfig); all OK.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* headers present in -devel package.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.
* web app; files are in /usr/share/%{name}

APPROVED; I'll let you decide what the license tag should be.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]