[Bug 195303] Review Request: perl-POE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-POE


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195303


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-06-14 16:26 EST -------
"GPL or Artistic" is more standard for License:.

Note that BR: perl is not required, and ExtUtils::MakeMaker, IO::Poll and
Term::Cap are all part of the base perl package so they aren't required either.

The %description is a bit wordy at 32 lines, but the digikamimageplugins package
has 49 lines of description so I guess it isn't much of a problem.

You might want to clean up the unused stuff in the %files section.

Everything builds in mock (x86_64, development); rpmlint says the following:

E: perl-POE useless-explicit-provides perl(POE::Kernel)
E: perl-POE useless-explicit-provides perl(POE::Loop::Tk)

I think rpmlint is a bit off here; there are no explicit Provides: in the spec;
RPM is just finding both versioned and unversioned dependencies from different
files.  (Loop::Tk comes from both Loop/Tk.pm and Loop/TkActiveState.pm.)  I
don't think it's worth trying to filter these.

Review:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream.
* source files match upstream:
   67eacd47c8d7c05a5f5a119af220de30  POE-0.3501.tar.gz
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (x86_64, development).
* rpmlint has only ignorable complaints.
O final provides and requires are sane (duplicated dependencies come from RPM):
   perl(POE) = 0.3501
   perl(POE::API::Ctl) = 1903
   perl(POE::API::ResLoader) = 1903
   perl(POE::Component) = 1903
   perl(POE::Component::Client::TCP) = 1957
   perl(POE::Component::Server::TCP) = 1956
   perl(POE::Driver) = 1903
   perl(POE::Driver::SysRW) = 1903
   perl(POE::Filter) = 1955
   perl(POE::Filter::Block) = 1920
   perl(POE::Filter::Grep) = 1953
   perl(POE::Filter::HTTPD) = 1958
   perl(POE::Filter::Line) = 1920
   perl(POE::Filter::Map) = 1953
   perl(POE::Filter::RecordBlock) = 1920
   perl(POE::Filter::Reference) = 1947
   perl(POE::Filter::Stackable) = 1963
   perl(POE::Filter::Stream) = 1920
   perl(POE::Kernel)
   perl(POE::Kernel) = 1938
   perl(POE::Loop) = 1903
   perl(POE::Loop::Event) = 1903
   perl(POE::Loop::Gtk) = 1903
   perl(POE::Loop::IO_Poll) = 1903
   perl(POE::Loop::PerlSignals) = 1903
   perl(POE::Loop::Select) = 1903
   perl(POE::Loop::Tk)
   perl(POE::Loop::Tk) = 1903
   perl(POE::Loop::TkActiveState) = 1914
   perl(POE::Loop::TkCommon) = 1924
   perl(POE::NFA) = 1946
   perl(POE::Pipe) = 1903
   perl(POE::Pipe::OneWay) = 1903
   perl(POE::Pipe::TwoWay) = 1903
   perl(POE::Queue) = 1903
   perl(POE::Queue::Array) = 1903
   perl(POE::Resource) = 1903
   perl(POE::Resources) = 1903
   perl(POE::Resources::Aliases) = 1903
   perl(POE::Resources::Controls) = 1903
   perl(POE::Resources::Events) = 1903
   perl(POE::Resources::Extrefs) = 1903
   perl(POE::Resources::FileHandles) = 1903
   perl(POE::Resources::SIDs) = 1903
   perl(POE::Resources::Sessions) = 1903
   perl(POE::Resources::Signals) = 1954
   perl(POE::Resources::Statistics) = 1911
   perl(POE::Session) = 1947
   perl(POE::Wheel) = 1903
   perl(POE::Wheel::Curses) = 1903
   perl(POE::Wheel::FollowTail) = 1903
   perl(POE::Wheel::ListenAccept) = 1903
   perl(POE::Wheel::ReadLine) = 1947
   perl(POE::Wheel::ReadLine::Keymap)
   perl(POE::Wheel::ReadWrite) = 1947
   perl(POE::Wheel::Run) = 1916
   perl(POE::Wheel::SocketFactory) = 1903
   perl-POE = 0.3501-0.fc6
  - 
   perl >= 0:5.00503
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(Carp)
   perl(Curses)
   perl(Errno)
   perl(File::Spec)
   perl(HTTP::Date)
   perl(HTTP::Request)
   perl(HTTP::Response)
   perl(HTTP::Status)
   perl(IO::Handle)
   perl(IO::Poll)
   perl(IO::Socket)
   perl(POE)
   perl(POE::API::ResLoader)
   perl(POE::Driver::SysRW)
   perl(POE::Filter)
   perl(POE::Filter::Line)
   perl(POE::Kernel)
   perl(POE::Loop::PerlSignals)
   perl(POE::Loop::TkCommon)
   perl(POE::Pipe)
   perl(POE::Resource::Controls)
   perl(POE::Resources)
   perl(POE::Session)
   perl(POE::Wheel::ReadWrite)
   perl(POE::Wheel::SocketFactory)
   perl(POSIX)
   perl(Socket)
   perl(Symbol)
   perl(Sys::Hostname)
   perl(Term::Cap)
   perl(Term::ReadKey)
   perl(Tk)
   perl(Tk) >= 800.021
   perl(URI)
   perl(bytes)
   perl(strict)
   perl(vars)
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass (noisily, but without failures)
   All tests successful, 68 tests skipped.
   Files=141, Tests=3271, 124 wallclock secs (11.83 cusr +  3.19 csys = 15.02 CPU)
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

APPROVED; don't forget to bump Release: to 1 when you check in.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]