Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wireshark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194578 ------- Additional Comments From rvokal@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-14 03:33 EST ------- Question: - In Summary, why are we listing "Red Hat Desktop" integration? Surely we aren't talking about the Desktop product we sell? Is this not GENERIC gnome frontend? Why can't we just say 'Gnome integration' ? Think of the trademark problems. Needswork: - Missing BuildRequires on desktop-file-utils, automake, libtool rpmlint output: E: wireshark invalid-version 0.99.1pre1 W: wireshark incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.99.1pre1-1 0.99.1pre1-1.2 W: wireshark conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/wireshark W: wireshark conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/wireshark E: wireshark zero-length /usr/sbin/idl2wrs E: wireshark script-without-shellbang /usr/sbin/idl2wrs W: wireshark devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libwiretap.so W: wireshark devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libwireshark.so W: wireshark symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/tethereal /usr/sbin/tshark W: wireshark doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/wireshark-0.99.1pre1/doc/dfilter2pod.pl /usr/bin/perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review