Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx |lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-06-14 02:49 EST ------- Unfortunatly many comments were lost here due to the BZ crash. Summarising: -Chris Petersen <lists forevermore net> needs this for his work so he posted a much improved spec and srpm (Chris can you repost a link to these please). -I responded that that was very nice of him and that I understand he wanted some progress because he needed this for his work, but that this wasn't helping in getting Didier sponsored as Didier himself must show that he is able to create proper specs. -Some friendly discussion -End result, Didier was only interested (for now) in getting SEC into FE, Chris is going to get it into FE since he needs it to work and Didier well submit a new package review request with the FE_NEEDSPONSOR flag if / when he wants to contribute something else. As such I'm removing the FE_NEEDSPONSOR blocker since this is now a regular review (with Chris being the review submitter). Chris repeating myself: please repost the link to your latest SRPM and spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review