Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manaworld - 2D mmorpg game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194787 hugo@xxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hugo@xxxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From hugo@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-11 21:08 EST ------- My Review: MUST (OK) * rpmlint does not return any warning/errors (good) * Package is named according to Package Naming Guidelines * Spec filename matches package base name * Package license is open-source compliant * License field matches package's license * License file (COPYING) is included in %doc * Spec file is written in American English * Spec file is legible * Source file from package matches the upstream source with md5sum: b142f603c75819a04ac50d876776e92b tmw-0.0.19.tar.gz * Package compiled and built fine in i386 * BuildRequires is used well * Package does not contain locale files * Package does not contain shared library files * Package is not relocatable * Package owns all directories it creates * No duplicate files in %files * macro use consistent * No -doc subpackage needed * %doc contains only files that do not affect application runtime * No -devel subpackage needed * No pkgconfig files (.pc) needed * Package does not contain libtool archives (.la) * Desktop file installed with desktop-file-install * Package does not own other packages' directories SHOULD (OK) * Scriptlets for icon cache are used in proper way * Package installs and runs just fine! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review