Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@xxxxxx 2006-06-10 02:24 EST ------- > strange-permission warnings All these come from rpmlinting the source package. I think this doesn't matter because the source file perms will change anyway when they get added to CVS and later pulled from there to create the actual SRPM (assuming the Core build system works roughly the same way as the Extras one). > pcsc-lite conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/reader.conf > pcsc-lite non-conffile-in-etc /etc/reader.conf.d/README Intentional, see earlier comments in this review. > pcsc-lite service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/pcscd Up for debate. IMHO there's no harm in leaving it enabled by default. > pcsc-lite incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/pcscd $prog rpmlint bug. > pcsc-lite incoherent-init-script-name pcscd Noise which I'm planning to filter in future rpmlint revisions. > pcsc-lite-devel no-dependency-on pcsc-lite rpmlint bug/limitation; this is intended (-devel has a dependency on -libs). > pcsc-lite-devel no-documentation This is ok. > pcsc-lite-libs no-documentation Right. Because pcsc-lite-libs can be installed without pcsc-lite, at least COPYING should be included in -libs too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review