[Bug 189374] Re-Review Request: jed: an editor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Re-Review Request: jed: an editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189374





------- Additional Comments From notting@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-06-06 10:19 EST -------
Re: dist tag, I've just not used it in the past because I'm not a
build-every-release-for-every-reelase person. I suppose it could be added; the
package itself is only really backportable to FC5 (due to slang2 requirements).

As to the rpath, there is stuff in the aclocal.m4 that it includes in configure
that adds rpath if slang is in (what it determines to be) a nonstandard directory.
The bits were only checking against /lib | /usr/lib | /usr/local/lib ; by
replacing /lib with /lib64 on arches that use that, it allows the check to
succeed. (Arguably, this shouldn't be checked in the package at all, but doing
this sort of patch is the path of least resistance, since I think upstream is
doing this check & rpathing for some Solaris stuff.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]