Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Fuse emulator utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167364 paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-05 05:33 EST ------- Review of fuse-emulator-utils-0.7.0-4 ------------------------------------- - rpmlint clean - package and spec naming OK - package meets guidelines - package is GPL, matches spec, text included - spec file written in English and is legible - sources match upstream - package builds OK in mock with reduced package list on rawhide (i386) - buildreqs OK - no locales, libraries, pkgconfig files, or subpackages to worry about - not relocatable - no directory ownership or permissions issues - no duplicate files - %clean section present and correct - macro usage is consistent - code, not content - no large docs - docs don't affect runtime - not a GUI package, no desktop file needed - no scriptlets Needswork: - %description still refers to "Fuse-emulation-utils " rather than "fuse-emulator-utils"; please add a full stop at the end of the description too. You can fix this in cvs if you prefer. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review