Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 seg@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|191590 | OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From seg@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-04 19:10 EST ------- MUST items: - rpmlint: Ok $ rpmlint dssi-examples-0.9.1-6.fc5.i386.rpm W: dssi-examples no-documentation Ignorable. W: dssi-examples dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/less_trivial_synth jack-dssi-host W: dssi-examples dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/trivial_sampler jack-dssi-host W: dssi-examples dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/trivial_synth jack-dssi-host Intentional. Main package supplies jack-dssi-host. - Package name: Ok - Spec name: Ok - Meets packaging guidelines: Ok - License: Ok - Spec in American English: Ok - Spec legible: Ok - Sources match upstream: Ok - Builds: Ok - BuildRequires: Ok - Locales: Ok - ldconfig: Ok - Relocation: Ok - Directory ownership: Ok - %files: Ok - %clean: Ok - Macros: Ok - Code vs. Content: Ok - Documentation: Ok - devel package: Ok - .desktop file: Ok SHOULD: - Includes license text: Ok - Mock build: Ok - Builds on all archs: Built on i386, x86_64 - Package functional: Tested on i386, x86_64 - Scriptlets: Ok - Subpackages: Ok NEEDSWORK: Source0: needs to be [...]sf.net/sourceforge/dssi/[...] or else I get a 404. (Did SF rearrange their URLs recently?) Fix the URL before import, and this is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review