Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ejabberd - A distributed, fault-tolerant Jabber/XMPP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192958 ------- Additional Comments From jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-03 10:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Just took a quick look at this and I'm having trouble figuring out these rpmlint > complaints: > > W: ejabberd no-soname /usr/lib64/ejabberd-1.1.1/priv/lib/expat_erl.so > W: ejabberd no-soname /usr/lib64/ejabberd-1.1.1/priv/lib/iconv_erl.so > W: ejabberd no-soname /usr/lib64/ejabberd-1.1.1/priv/lib/stringprep_drv.so > W: ejabberd no-soname /usr/lib64/ejabberd-1.1.1/priv/lib/ejabberd_zlib_drv.so > W: ejabberd no-soname /usr/lib64/ejabberd-1.1.1/priv/lib/tls_drv.so > > [...] > > Unfortuantely I've no idea how problematic this is or how you'd go about fixing it. I don't think that its a problem... the libraries aren't general purpose shared libraries but are dynamically loaded modules pulled in by the Erlang runtime. They are similar to Python or Perl modules coded in C rather than Python/Perl. They are versioned by the %{_libdir}/ejabberd-1.1.1 directory so different versions of ejabberd shouldn't load the wrong modules. It seemes to work - I have personally set up three servers using these ejabberd RPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review