[Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904


fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-06-03 07:58 EST -------
It seems this package owns some directories already owned by shared-mime-info,
as well as some other directories onto /usr/share/mime.

[iago@puhisher share]$ rpm -qf /usr/share/mime
shared-mime-info-0.17-1.fc5.1
monodevelop-0.11-2
[iago@puhisher share]$ rpm -qf /usr/share/mime/packages
shared-mime-info-0.17-1.fc5.1
monodevelop-0.11-2

[iago@puhisher share]$ rpm -ql monodevelop | grep mime | grep -v .xml$
/usr/share/mime
/usr/share/mime/XMLnamespaces
/usr/share/mime/aliases
/usr/share/mime/application
/usr/share/mime/globs
/usr/share/mime/magic
/usr/share/mime/mime.cache
/usr/share/mime/packages
/usr/share/mime/subclasses
/usr/share/mime/

May be it's worth to fix it now  to avoid the case of /usr/share/applications.

[iago@puhisher share]$ rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/share/applications
gnome-media-2.14.0-2
bug-buddy-2.14.0-1
glade2-2.12.1-2
gnome-utils-2.14.0-4.fc5.1
nautilus-2.14.1-1.fc5.1
openoffice.org-calc-2.0.2-5.12.2
gthumb-2.7.5.1-1.fc5.1
openoffice.org-impress-2.0.2-5.12.2
eog-2.14.1-1.fc5.1
file-roller-2.14.2-1.fc5.1
gnome-system-monitor-2.14.1-1.fc5.1
gedit-2.14.2-1.fc5.1
openoffice.org-draw-2.0.2-5.12.2
openoffice.org-writer-2.0.2-5.12.2
gnome-session-2.14.1-1.fc5.1
openoffice.org-math-2.0.2-5.12.2
gdm-2.14.4-1.fc5.1
gnome-terminal-2.14.1-1.fc5.1
gnome-games-2.14.1-1.fc5.3
gftp-2.0.18-3.2.1
filesystem-2.3.7-1.2.1
monodevelop-0.11-2

I think all those packages should require filesystem to avoid this mess up - or
 require nothing explicitly, assuming filesystem is already installed.

Otherwise the monodevelop package looks and works fine here.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]