Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scite - Scintilla based text editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193787 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-02 23:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) (dynamically linking scintilla) > It can surely be done, but it would require a lot of work and I don't think it's > worth it. I can understand that; I was merely curious as to its feasibility since it seems cleaner. But if it's not intended to work that way then there's not much point. > I see your point, but I'm very sorry to hear this. Though I haven't made any > comments on other RRs I've been following the discussions for a while > (fedora-extras-list included). Well, you can always go ahead and make a review comments. (You can't assign bugs to yourself or change their status but you can make comments.) We're really just trying to establish two things: that you understand the packaging guidelines and you're willing to commit to maintaining your packages in the long term. We can guage the former by looking at review comments and the quality of packages you've submitted, but it's hard to guage the latter so we have to look at depth of community involvement. Your quick response to comments is encouraging, and if you have anything you'd like to point me at that would help to reassure me, I'd be happy to take a look. The package itself is fine, although I'd still have to do a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review