Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 ------- Additional Comments From mccann0011@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-02 12:37 EST ------- Seeing the discussions for the gdal issue, its probably time to ping the reviewers and see what the status of this package is. From my point of view, the issues that have been raised have all been answered - the main issue being the licensing of the EPSG data. As noted above, this package, as well as proj, gdal, etc all come from the same upstream author and all contain the EPSG tables. My research showed that there was no intent from the distributors of this data to exclude it from open-source use. These packages are all available in the debian world. Anyways, if someone can rereview this and let me know if there are still outstanding issues, I'd be happy to address them. We can also consider the upgrade to 1.2.3 now or after submission. PS Note that gdal contains an embedded libgeotiff package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review